Search the selected area by proposal, reference, status, type, authority or date.
116 applications found.
T1 robinia: Reduce overhanging limbs by approximately 2 m, pruning back close to the boundary to suitable growth points, to provide appropriate clearance from the neighbouring property.
Whitebeam tree front garden reduce canopy by 50cm Cotoneaster tree front garden reduce canopy by 50cm
(submitted as 26/01849/TPO)The tree is in the left hand corner of the garden and I want it removed
Trees 1 & 2: Horse chestnuts. The two mature horse chestnuts, approximately 24m in height, contain included unions arising from historic pollard points at approximately 15m. Such unions represent recognised structural weaknesses, with Smiley (2003) demonstrating significantly reduced attachment strength where included bark is present. Subsequent biomechanical research by Kane et al. (2008) and Slater (2010?present) further supports the management of structurally compromised unions through appropriate load reduction. A crown reduction of approximately 4?5m is therefore proposed to reduce sail area and bending moments acting upon these unions, materially reducing the likelihood of structural failure whilst retaining both trees, their principal framework and their substantial amenity value. The presence of both trees growing together means that the treatment which is more applicable for tree 1, must equally be applied to tree 2 in order to prevent changes in oscillation through the respective canopies and future upper canopy limb failure.
The tree is a small domestic apple tree in the rear garden and is no longer required. It has limited amenity value due to it's position within the private rear garden and is not visible from the public highway. Removal is proposed to allow the garden to be redesigned and make better use of available space.
T1 Field Maple - Reduce longer branches by up to 1.5m & cutback over hang from neighbours garden to limit shading & overhang by approx. 2m G1 Eucalyptus - Reduce height to reduce risk of failure or wind throw 3-4m to good growth points T2 Field Maple - Reduce crown 1m to maintain size & clear away from building brickwork
Our house is in a TPO polygon. There are two small trees in our garden to the left and right of our garden. The tree on the right side has grown and damaged/ crushed the fence. The trees themselves are not individually TPO protected trees but within this polygon that covers the majority (not all) of the house and gardens and they are small. We would like to remove them. We would also like to please cut/ trim the neighbouring trees at 10 and 12 Austen Close to the boundary line as they're overgrown and coming into our garden, through the fences and threaten further damage. I understand if they were not in a TPO polygon this would be allowed without permission? We would like to remove the two small trees (labelled L for left and R for right) on the sketch within our garden please. I do not know the type of trees they are, I believe the TPO was issued in 1947. We would like to just do basic maintenance and remove the two small trees in our garden.
T1 Horse Chestnut - Fell, the tree dominates the rear garden and surrounding properties. Damage is being caused to the retaining walls by the constricted roots. (see report)
NMA to application 24/02388/HOU to Omit loft conversion, Omit 2 No. Rooflights, Omit 1 No. Window, Internal Layout Reconfiguration
submitted as 26/01744/TPC. G1 - Remove any trees growing within 1m of wall long Worthy Road. Crown lift to 5.2m over highway and cut back from lamp post to provide to provide statutory clearance.
T1 - Sycamore - Located to rear of property - Would like to Re-pollard to previous high pollard point removing up to 3m.
Discharge of condition 3 (photographic record and proposed works for decorative plaster ceiling) of 26/01231/LIS.
T1: Yew. Fell. The wall is being rebuilt, and is not accessible without felling the yew tree and removing the stump. The tree is low value, and teh loss to the site is minimal.
Proposed detached open sided pergola to existing pub garden to replace dilapidated smoking solution - extend patio, picket fence and adapt U/A parking space.
Application for full planning permission to provide 153 dwellings (including affordable housing provision), new pedestrian and cycle routes, landscaping, parking, public open space, improvement of existing access, drainage and all other necessary on site infrastructure;
Replacement of the cart-lodge bressummer and associated structural repairs; repair works to the modern north-facing wall on the rear elevation, replacement rainwater goods, and all associated repair, conservation, making-good and ancillary works.
Application Reference Number: 26/00055/HOU Date of Decision: 10/03/2026 Condition Number(s): 2, The development hereby approved shall be constructed in accordance with the following plans: Proposed Plans: 3380/01_ C Conditions(s) Removal: During the detailed Building Regulations and Party Wall process, discussions have resulted in a proposed amendment to the parapet wall arrangement shown on the approved drawings. These changes have arisen solely from technical construction and Party Wall matters and are not intended to alter the overall scale, footprint or design of the approved extension. 2, The development hereby approved shall be constructed in accordance with the following plans: Proposed Plans: 3380/01_ E
We wish to do a crown reduction on the 3 silver birch trees that are overhanging both our garden and our neighbours garden in Princess Court. We wish to remove 3-5 meters to have the trees no higher than 10 meters high.
T1- Apple- Remove to ground level.
Norway Maple (Acer Platanoides), Tag No. 2379 (Tree does not have a TPO according to Winchester Council TPO map) The client's patio is unusable due to the amount of bird droppings (See attachments 'Photo 1' & 'Photo 2') coming from birds perching in the overhanging tree. The tree overhangs the client's boundary line by approximately four meters and the number of birds has significantly increased since the adjacent tree; another Norway Maple (Tag No. 2380) of similar size was removed in December 2025. My client has also sent an email at the end of June to both the property management company and a member of the Residents Association to inform of the intended works but has had no reply. The scope of works is to reduce the east south-eastern side by approximately 2-3m back to towards the boundary line, targeting horizontal branches that birds are likely to sit on, while leaving angled/diagonal branches to maintain the natural shape of the tree.
The proposal is a modest, internal, fully reversible installation of a demountable, level-compensating floor system within two first-floor office rooms.
Enlargement of existing rear dormer.
Installation of residential sky garden
Internal Alterations to sub-divide the building.
Check recent applications before setting up alerts. This prevents older applications being sent as new alerts.
Preparation uses a shared source check. Busy sources or larger areas may need the next scheduled collection. No alerts are enabled or emails sent by this step.
These rules were checked at the search location (SO23 7EF). They do not necessarily apply to every address in the results area.
These describe protections or restrictions on the location. They are not planning applications or council decisions.
These are planning protections or restrictions that apply at the location we checked. They can affect what you are allowed to build, alter or demolish. The number beside a heading simply tells you how many overlapping map records were found — it is not a rating and it is not the number of planning applications.
This location is inside Winchester. Conservation areas can mean tighter rules for changes to the outside of a property, trees and demolition.
