40 Hyde Close Winchester Hampshire SO23 7DT
Whitebeam tree front garden reduce canopy by 50cm Cotoneaster tree front garden reduce canopy by 50cm
- Reference
- 26/01848/TPC
- Application date
- 7 Sep 2026
Search the selected area by proposal, reference, status, type, authority or date.
20 applications found.
Whitebeam tree front garden reduce canopy by 50cm Cotoneaster tree front garden reduce canopy by 50cm
Trees 1 & 2: Horse chestnuts. The two mature horse chestnuts, approximately 24m in height, contain included unions arising from historic pollard points at approximately 15m. Such unions represent recognised structural weaknesses, with Smiley (2003) demonstrating significantly reduced attachment strength where included bark is present. Subsequent biomechanical research by Kane et al. (2008) and Slater (2010?present) further supports the management of structurally compromised unions through appropriate load reduction. A crown reduction of approximately 4?5m is therefore proposed to reduce sail area and bending moments acting upon these unions, materially reducing the likelihood of structural failure whilst retaining both trees, their principal framework and their substantial amenity value. The presence of both trees growing together means that the treatment which is more applicable for tree 1, must equally be applied to tree 2 in order to prevent changes in oscillation through the respective canopies and future upper canopy limb failure.
The tree is a small domestic apple tree in the rear garden and is no longer required. It has limited amenity value due to it's position within the private rear garden and is not visible from the public highway. Removal is proposed to allow the garden to be redesigned and make better use of available space.
Our house is in a TPO polygon. There are two small trees in our garden to the left and right of our garden. The tree on the right side has grown and damaged/ crushed the fence. The trees themselves are not individually TPO protected trees but within this polygon that covers the majority (not all) of the house and gardens and they are small. We would like to remove them. We would also like to please cut/ trim the neighbouring trees at 10 and 12 Austen Close to the boundary line as they're overgrown and coming into our garden, through the fences and threaten further damage. I understand if they were not in a TPO polygon this would be allowed without permission? We would like to remove the two small trees (labelled L for left and R for right) on the sketch within our garden please. I do not know the type of trees they are, I believe the TPO was issued in 1947. We would like to just do basic maintenance and remove the two small trees in our garden.
NMA to application 24/02388/HOU to Omit loft conversion, Omit 2 No. Rooflights, Omit 1 No. Window, Internal Layout Reconfiguration
submitted as 26/01744/TPC. G1 - Remove any trees growing within 1m of wall long Worthy Road. Crown lift to 5.2m over highway and cut back from lamp post to provide to provide statutory clearance.
T1: Yew. Fell. The wall is being rebuilt, and is not accessible without felling the yew tree and removing the stump. The tree is low value, and teh loss to the site is minimal.
Proposed detached open sided pergola to existing pub garden to replace dilapidated smoking solution - extend patio, picket fence and adapt U/A parking space.
Application for full planning permission to provide 153 dwellings (including affordable housing provision), new pedestrian and cycle routes, landscaping, parking, public open space, improvement of existing access, drainage and all other necessary on site infrastructure;
Application Reference Number: 26/00055/HOU Date of Decision: 10/03/2026 Condition Number(s): 2, The development hereby approved shall be constructed in accordance with the following plans: Proposed Plans: 3380/01_ C Conditions(s) Removal: During the detailed Building Regulations and Party Wall process, discussions have resulted in a proposed amendment to the parapet wall arrangement shown on the approved drawings. These changes have arisen solely from technical construction and Party Wall matters and are not intended to alter the overall scale, footprint or design of the approved extension. 2, The development hereby approved shall be constructed in accordance with the following plans: Proposed Plans: 3380/01_ E
Two-storey front extension and external alterations.
Non material amendments to house types and floor plans of plots 762, 765, 775, 779, 780, 781, 792 and 797 of Kings Barton Phase 3Aii (19/01983/REM) as set out in revised plans submitted for approval
Discharge of conditions for 25/02183/FUL- Condition No.s 3, 5, 6, 10, 19, 21 and 22
Installation of ground seated heat pump, a low wall mounted air conditioning unit to the front elevation of the dwelling, and a higher second unit to the side elevation (west)
Erection of garden room
Replacement rear dormer extension and alterations
2-storey side extension and garage extension
Ground investigation, remediation and associated works following demolition of building to slab level under 26/00867/DEM
Erection of a single storey extension on the rear elevation and add a fixed window to the side elevation.
Erection of two-storey extension for boxing club
Check recent applications before setting up alerts. This prevents older applications being sent as new alerts.
Preparation uses a shared source check. Busy sources or larger areas may need the next scheduled collection. No alerts are enabled or emails sent by this step.