See applications in the area below, alongside planning rules and protections at your chosen location.
Within 0.62 miles of SO23 7RUApplication dates: 22 Sep 2025 to 22 Sep 2026Showing applications within 0.62 miles of this postcode.
23applications found0Types of mapped rules or protections found here, such as conservation areas, listed buildings or flood-risk zones. We count each type once, separately from applications. A zero means none were returned by our data sources; other restrictions may still apply.
SEARCH APPLICATIONS
Narrow your search
Search the selected area by proposal, reference, status, type, authority or date.
T1 robinia: Reduce overhanging limbs by approximately 2 m, pruning back close to the boundary to suitable growth points, to provide appropriate clearance from the neighbouring property.
The tree is a mature Holm Oak in my back garden. My arboricultural adviser has identified a split in the trunk and recommends the tree is felled as soon as possible as it is in danger of falling on my neighbour's garage (with flat above).
Trees 1 & 2: Horse chestnuts. The two mature horse chestnuts, approximately 24m in height, contain included unions arising from historic pollard points at approximately 15m. Such unions represent recognised structural weaknesses, with Smiley (2003) demonstrating significantly reduced attachment strength where included bark is present. Subsequent biomechanical research by Kane et al. (2008) and Slater (2010?present) further supports the management of structurally compromised unions through appropriate load reduction. A crown reduction of approximately 4?5m is therefore proposed to reduce sail area and bending moments acting upon these unions, materially reducing the likelihood of structural failure whilst retaining both trees, their principal framework and their substantial amenity value. The presence of both trees growing together means that the treatment which is more applicable for tree 1, must equally be applied to tree 2 in order to prevent changes in oscillation through the respective canopies and future upper canopy limb failure.
The tree is a small domestic apple tree in the rear garden and is no longer required. It has limited amenity value due to it's position within the private rear garden and is not visible from the public highway. Removal is proposed to allow the garden to be redesigned and make better use of available space.
T1 Field Maple - Reduce longer branches by up to 1.5m & cutback over hang from neighbours garden to limit shading & overhang by approx. 2m G1 Eucalyptus - Reduce height to reduce risk of failure or wind throw 3-4m to good growth points T2 Field Maple - Reduce crown 1m to maintain size & clear away from building brickwork
Alter the existing kitchen and dining room to create an open plan kitchen-diner, replacing a window and patio door in the dining room, building a raised patio area, installing a window in the first-floor bathroom, removal of areas of slate cladding to the rear elevation and repointing of underlying brickwork, and widening the existing garage door frame to meet the aperture of the brickwork (the existing garage door will be retained and reused). (AMENDED DESCRIPTION)
Replacement single storey rear extension, extenal insulation and cladding of existing side extension, creation of front and rear roof overhangs and all associated works.
T1 x Purple Cut Leaf Beech tree reduce canopy height by 2m and shape lateral limbs to suit. Crown lift to 4 by removal of secondary growth only. General management of garden and allow more light under canopy.
T1 - Mulberry Tree sited within the raised walled bank Fell Historically pollard on cyclical management; planted within a raised wall structure and is now outgrowing the space, with the roots beginning to hair line crack the structure. Request removal before this impacts the wall further, notwithstanding that due to heavy pollard it is of low amenity value and should be removed as per the desire of the homeowners.
Erection of a single storey education building, plus rooftop plant room, connecting to the existing South Side and Administration Buildings; minor alterations to the existing buildings; alterations to existing entrance from Park Avenue to remove vehicular access, minor alterations to the existing entrance from North Walls including widening of footpath; reconfiguration of car parking spaces and access road; site wide landscaping including demolition of existing structures and replacement boundary treatment; ground works for installation of drainage attenuation tanks; and associated works.
Construction of a new single storey rear extension, two storey side extension, raising of main roof ridge, loft conversion, associated floor plan alterations and all associated works
T1,2&3 Birch - Reduce to match adjacent laurel in height and prune sides to keep shape as best as possible. Leaving middle Birch slightly higher. Approx. 1-2M T4 Magnolia - Prune longer growth to tidy and reshape. Max 1M G1 Hazel - Prune back overhang to allow more light to Cherry beneath. Max 2m back to boundary line G2 Conifers - Reduce in height by approx. 4-5M T5 Sycamore - Reduce in height to match final height of adjacent Conifers, Approx. 3-4M
The apple tree is right opposite the back door. I wish to remove this tree - the apples cannot be eaten and they it is attracting rodents including Rats who are climbing the tree for the apples. I have consulted a tree surgeon who recommends removing tree to ground level My intention is to plant a cherry tree in its place as there is already one in the garden
T1 - Cedar - Remove 1 low branch from Cedar that's growing into Conifer. Cut back from house to give 1-2m clearance. Reduce end weight by approx 1m on a few select low branches branches on house side to reduce risk of future failure.
We have recently received approval to have some tree on our property reduced and whilst Ben came to visit, we discussed our magnolia tree as well as our fir tree. The fir tree is not doing as well as it could and we discussed how it could be improved. We have decided to reduce the magnolia tree (already approved by you) to allow a bit more light to get to the fir tree but there are also 2 small self seeded trees on the other side of the wall that are restricting growth. We would like to apply to get these 2 small self seeded trees removed. They are Plum and Macrocarpa trees. They are on the turning area on our road which will in due time also restrict the use of this turning area.
Planning information from local councils and PlanIt. Area boundaries use ONS and Planning Data where available. Check the council record for the latest decisions and documents.
SAVED REPORTSave this reportKeep this exact planning view in My Places.
Watch this area
Check recent applications before setting up alerts. This prevents older applications being sent as new alerts.
Preparation uses a shared source check. Busy sources or larger areas may need the next scheduled collection. No alerts are enabled or emails sent by this step.
Checking your analytics preference.
Help improve Place KeysGoogle Analytics is on to help us understand how our public pages are used. You can turn it off at any time. About analytics & cookies