See applications in the area below, alongside planning rules and protections at your chosen location.
Within 0.62 miles of SO23 7RXApplication dates: 22 Sep 2025 to 22 Sep 2026Showing applications within 0.62 miles of this postcode.
10applications found0Types of mapped rules or protections found here, such as conservation areas, listed buildings or flood-risk zones. We count each type once, separately from applications. A zero means none were returned by our data sources; other restrictions may still apply.
SEARCH APPLICATIONS
Narrow your search
Search the selected area by proposal, reference, status, type, authority or date.
Trees 1 & 2: Horse chestnuts. The two mature horse chestnuts, approximately 24m in height, contain included unions arising from historic pollard points at approximately 15m. Such unions represent recognised structural weaknesses, with Smiley (2003) demonstrating significantly reduced attachment strength where included bark is present. Subsequent biomechanical research by Kane et al. (2008) and Slater (2010?present) further supports the management of structurally compromised unions through appropriate load reduction. A crown reduction of approximately 4?5m is therefore proposed to reduce sail area and bending moments acting upon these unions, materially reducing the likelihood of structural failure whilst retaining both trees, their principal framework and their substantial amenity value. The presence of both trees growing together means that the treatment which is more applicable for tree 1, must equally be applied to tree 2 in order to prevent changes in oscillation through the respective canopies and future upper canopy limb failure.
The tree is a small domestic apple tree in the rear garden and is no longer required. It has limited amenity value due to it's position within the private rear garden and is not visible from the public highway. Removal is proposed to allow the garden to be redesigned and make better use of available space.
Our house is in a TPO polygon. There are two small trees in our garden to the left and right of our garden. The tree on the right side has grown and damaged/ crushed the fence. The trees themselves are not individually TPO protected trees but within this polygon that covers the majority (not all) of the house and gardens and they are small. We would like to remove them. We would also like to please cut/ trim the neighbouring trees at 10 and 12 Austen Close to the boundary line as they're overgrown and coming into our garden, through the fences and threaten further damage. I understand if they were not in a TPO polygon this would be allowed without permission? We would like to remove the two small trees (labelled L for left and R for right) on the sketch within our garden please. I do not know the type of trees they are, I believe the TPO was issued in 1947. We would like to just do basic maintenance and remove the two small trees in our garden.
Installation of ground seated heat pump, a low wall mounted air conditioning unit to the front elevation of the dwelling, and a higher second unit to the side elevation (west)
Replacement single storey rear extension, extenal insulation and cladding of existing side extension, creation of front and rear roof overhangs and all associated works.
Planning information from local councils and PlanIt. Area boundaries use ONS and Planning Data where available. Check the council record for the latest decisions and documents.
SAVED REPORTSave this reportKeep this exact planning view in My Places.
Watch this area
Check recent applications before setting up alerts. This prevents older applications being sent as new alerts.
Preparation uses a shared source check. Busy sources or larger areas may need the next scheduled collection. No alerts are enabled or emails sent by this step.
Checking your analytics preference.
Help improve Place KeysGoogle Analytics is on to help us understand how our public pages are used. You can turn it off at any time. About analytics & cookies
