See applications in the area below, alongside planning rules and protections at your chosen location.
Within 1 km of TQ1 4RYApplication dates: 15 Sep 2025 to 15 Sep 2026Showing applications within 1 km of this postcode.
42stored matches · incomplete0Types of mapped rules or protections found here, such as conservation areas, listed buildings or flood-risk zones. We count each type once, separately from applications. A zero means none were returned by our data sources; other restrictions may still apply.
SEARCH APPLICATIONS
Narrow your search
Search the selected area by proposal, reference, status, type, authority or date.
42 matching stored records. Coverage is incomplete; this is not a complete application count.
Stored planning records. Showing retained planning records with incomplete or older coverage. Latest stored source check: 15 Sep 2026, 04:07 UTC. Newer applications or decisions may be missing.
Variation of condition in relation to P/2023/0721 (Demolition of existing hotel building and erection of 14 residential apartments, and associated parking and landscaping.): Condition P1 - (approved plans). Variation sought: amendments to scheme, including simplification of elevations and roof form, reduction in visual complexity and articulation, reposition of cycle storage, adjusted parking layout & revised apartment layouts.
Reference
P/2026/0118
Application date
27 Feb 2026
Decision date
30 Jun 2026
Decision
Approval
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:07 UTC
Removal of existing 15m monopole supporting 3 no. antennas on open headframe, and installation of 20m monopole supporting 6 no. antennas on open headframe, 1 no. 300mm transmission dish and ancillary development there to including 18 no Ericsson Radio Systems (ERS).
Reference
P/2026/0097
Application date
19 Feb 2026
Decision date
15 Apr 2026
Decision
Prior Approval Granted
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:07 UTC
Variation of condition in relation to P/2024/0432 (Extension and reconfiguration of mixed-use residential-commercial building to six apartments. Existing commercial space to be retained.): Condition 04 - Joinery. Variation sought: Installation of heritage-style uPVC windows.
Reference
P/2026/0066
Application date
3 Feb 2026
Decision date
10 Apr 2026
Decision
Refusal
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:07 UTC
Non-material amendment relating to P/2024/0432. Amendments sought: modification of rear dormer to create inset dormer, removal of 2no. chimney stacks to rear and removal of 3no. windows to side.
Reference
P/2026/0067
Application date
3 Feb 2026
Decision date
10 Apr 2026
Decision
Refusal
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:07 UTC
T2 - European Lime (Tilia europaea) Re-pollard tree, Remove ivy and epicormic growth from base to allow proper future inspections T3 - Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)- Fell the four dead stems T4 - Holly (Ilex aquifolium)- Remove minor deadwood T6 - Sweet Chestnut (Castanea sativa)- Remove hanging branch, Remove deadwood over targets (paths, benches, seating areas) T7 - Sweet Chestnut (Castanea sativa)- Fell tree while it is still accessible due to advanced decline and structural defects T8 - Common Beech (Fagus sylvatica)- Remove major deadwood
Reference
AT/2026/0027
Application date
20 Jan 2026
Decision date
24 Feb 2026
Decision
No Objections Raised
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:07 UTC
EXEMPTION NOTICE T1 Horse Chestnut: Fell to near ground level. I am writing to inform you that we intend to remove the tree in question on 6th of January 2026. The horse chestnut has suffered two recent major limb failures within the last few months, which caused damage to property. Inspection of the failed limbs shows extensive internal decay, with the wood at the point of failure being completely rotten. The tree exhibits fungal brackets indicative of significant internal decay. Given the history of failure, the presence of advanced decay, and the proximity of property, the tree presents a foreseeable risk of serious harm. Further limb failure is considered likely and cannot be reliably mitigated through pruning. The local Tree Officer has been consulted and has confirmed that removal is acceptable under the dangerous tree exemption. Replacement tree: The tree is located within a confined raised bed enclosed by a stone wall. Following removal, the stump and associated root plate will occupy the majority of the available space. Stump removal would require significant excavation and disturbance to the surrounding structure and hard landscaping, resulting in disproportionate cost and disruption. For these reasons, on-site replacement planting is not considered practical. The applicant intends to plant shrubs and ornamental plants suitable for the available soil volume around the stump.
Reference
AT/2025/0369
Application date
17 Dec 2025
Decision date
22 Dec 2025
Decision
Approval
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
Isolated damp proofing behind existing dry linings internally. Lead weathering to isolated pediments to prevent water penetration. Roof repairs. Velux replacement where existing is leaking.
Reference
P/2025/0752
Application date
26 Nov 2025
Decision date
13 Jul 2026
Decision
Withdrawn
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
G001 Mixed Species - Reduce to 1.5m hedge. Prior to urgent wall repair G002 Mixed species - Reduce to 1.5m hedge (incl T008). Prior to urgent wall repair T001 - Norway Maple. Re-pollard as previously undertaken. ///picked.cages.hooks T002 - Common Lime. Review with regard to structural wall repairs. Weak union. Fell - ///foal.vision.tell T003 - Common Lime - Pollard @ 8m desired reduction reasonable given pruning history. Review with regard to structural wall repairs - ///juror.suffer.ranged T004 Norway Maple - Extensive wall repairs in close proximity likely to render retention unfeasible.- Fell tree. Review with regard to structural wall repairs. T005 - Holm Oak - pollard at 8m. desired and would help alleviate adverse impacts of significant wall repair in proximity on stability. Prior to urgent wall repair.- ///alone.payer.issued T006 - Holm Oak Remove tree to enable effective wall repair to take place. Consider retaining approx 2m of stem. Prior to urgent wall repair. ///lately.bind.crowds T007 -Common Lime - To be pollarded at 8m desired however retention in the event of significant wall repair in close proximity questionable. Prior to urgent wall repair - ///films.worth.dinner T008 - English Yew - Reduce to 1.5m and integrate to hedge prior to urgent wall repair. ///stages.influencing.panel T009 - Common Lime - To be pollarded at 8-9m 91m (above historic pruning point) - ///punt.stones.leader T010 - English Yew - Fell Tree. Prior to urgent wall repair T011 - EnglishYew - Reduce to approx 2m. Prior to urgent wall repair.
Reference
AT/2025/0332
Application date
5 Nov 2025
Decision date
14 Apr 2026
Decision
Part allowed/part refused
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
Removal of Pittosporum tree that has grown too tall and is now damaging wall between properties and is touching the side of the house. Matt Bayles tree services has looked and recommended removal of the Pittosporum.
Reference
AT/2025/0287
Application date
25 Sep 2025
Decision date
10 Nov 2025
Decision
No Objections Raised
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
Fell Sycamore (T014) as per Tree report - Due to: Vitality poor - significant dieback throughout the canopy represented in a loss of leaf material of approximately 80%.
Reference
AT/2025/0288
Application date
25 Sep 2025
Decision date
24 Nov 2025
Decision
Approval
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
We are applying to do the below Removal of dying Cherry Tree as per assessment by Matt Bayles tree Services Removal of 1 x live branch which is encroaching the neighbours conservatory and 2 x dead branches to the right as per the images provided Matt Bayles Tree Services will be engaged to do the tree work.
Reference
AT/2025/0285
Application date
24 Sep 2025
Decision date
10 Nov 2025
Decision
No Objections Raised
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
Removal of Ash x 2 overhanging garage at back back or property marked purple on sketch Holm Oak removal which is impeding the growth of a Yew tree with has a TPO marked Pink on the sketch Branch removal from Yew at back of property hanging over Fire Escape and roof of building. Marked Orange on Sketch
Reference
AT/2025/0286
Application date
24 Sep 2025
Decision date
10 Nov 2025
Decision
No Objections Raised
PlanIt / local planning authorities · Collected 15 Sep 2026 04:06 UTC
← PreviousPage 2 of 2 Showing retained planning records with incomplete or older coverage. Latest stored source check: 15 Sep 2026, 04:07 UTC. Newer applications or decisions may be missing. Applications are collected from council open data where connected and PlanIt for other coverage. A council register is not counted as a backup until its feed is connected. Area boundaries use ONS and Planning Data where available. Check the council record for current decisions and documents.
SAVED REPORTSave this reportKeep this exact planning view in My Places.
Area alerts will be available after a complete source check. Existing watches remain saved.
Checking your analytics preference.
Help improve Place KeysGoogle Analytics is on to help us understand how our public pages are used. You can turn it off at any time. About analytics & cookies