Search the selected area by proposal, reference, status, type, authority or date.
56 applications found.
Certificate of Lawfulness to confirm that the building operations comprising the construction of the outbuilding shown as 'Old Mess Room' on Thames Water Drawing 691B/A7/00006/IN are lawful under section 171B(1) TCPA 1990
T1. Holly Tree. 12 metres in height. 5 metres in width. Fell to ground level as tree is decaying at the base of tree. Tree is situated on the road leading to the second car park. T2. Lime Tree. 15 metres in height. 6 metres in width. Monolith to 8 metres (just above crown break). Remove 7 metres from the height. Tree has decay present from the ground up to approximately 3.5 metres. Situated in the rear communal garden, towards building.
Alterations including erection of single storey side extension.
T1 - x1 cedar deodora rear garden fell as close to ground level as possible. Health and safety reasons, risk of branches shedding, risk of total failure.
Details of Carbon reductions pursuant to Condition 10 of planning permission dated 26/01/2022 ref 2021/4704 (Redevelopment and erection of 2 x two-storey buildings to provide 2 x 2-bedroom and 2 x 1-bedroom flats with associated refuse and cycle storage.)
G1 - Leylandii hedge remove. Hedge is now dying off in patches. Replant with species tbc
T13 ??? 1 x Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris.- to fell. Height - 14.5 m DBH ??? 635 mm Spread: North ??? 2 meters West ??? 7 meter South ??? 7 meters East- 2 meters The tree is located in the grass area to the right of the access path leading to the main entrance. The psychology is good with a good amount of foliage throughout the tree. The tree shows historical phototropic growth with leaning towards the property on the west and south with all branch growth in this direction. This would indicate growing with completion with large trees to the north. Evidence of street trees which has been removed and a newly planted Lime in its place and an existing street tree, Oak Quercus which has been lopped and topped at 8 meters. There are wounds on the main stem; Wound 1 on the south side at 0.5 meter Wound 2 on the west side at 1 meter Wound 3 on the South west side. Elongated with server resin bleeding. With reactionary growth on either side. Wound 4 ??? A large open wound (Due to historical poor branch removal) located at 5 meters. The wound has a width of 400mm and a height of 580mm. The diameter of the wound 540mm with a depth of the cavity at the same point 400mm. Wound 5- elongated open wound to the south side at 6.2 meters. Width of wound is 170mm and height of 800mm. There is reactionary wood around the wound. Both visual and actual evidence of animal activity. Whilst carrying out the inspection 3 squirrels vacated from the lowest hole on wound 4 and from the hole in wound 5 indicating that the whole section is hollow. Wound 6- There are 5 branches historically removed with good reactive growth. Due to the tree being hollow with loss of live, active wood on the compression side, where the conifers would support themselves. There is a large amount of growth, weight on the same side causing leaning. This is a high target area with high foot fall with a risks of injury to persons as well as damage to the property, therefore we recommend the felling of the tree, stump remova
T2 Conifer Fell to ground and grind stump to approx. 300mm below ground level.
Alterations including erection of single storey rear extension, and two storey side extension to rear half of the building, including infilling of the stepped flank wall and new windows; erection of rear mansard roof extension to main roof with dormer windows and French doors and safety railings; replacement of the existing flat roof over the front ground floor bay and porch with a pitched roof.
T1: Lime at front of property - remove major deadwood. Rear Garden T2: Oak - Crown reduce by 5m to previous points leaving tree 15m tall and 5m wide. T3: Oak - Crown reduce by 5m to previous points leaving tree 15m tall and 5m wide. T4: Oak - Remove major deadwood. Remove lowest branches to re-shape crown.
Front : Dying Mountain ash - remove. Adjacent Ash tree - reduce by approx. 2 metres and remove deadwood. Rear : Large Laurel tree next to garages - remove. Rear Boundary : 2 Large Horse Chestnut trees - reduce smaller tree to 2 metres below old cutting points. Larger tree - reduce to same height as smaller tree after cutting.
T1-Mimosa Previously reduced with dense and extensive regrowth Reduce crown back to the previous pruning points, 1-2m from branch tips T2-Oak Heavily leaning tree, Previously reduced with dense and extensive regrowth Reduce crown back to the previous pruning points, 2-3m from branch tips
T1 - London Plane - Reduce crown by approx. 2-3m in order to take new re-growth back to previous pollard points. Remove all epicormic growth and major dead wood. Justification - This tree appears to have been historically pollarded, with significant secondary regrowth now developing beyond the previous pollard heads. Returning the crown to these established pollard points will maintain the tree within its historical management regime, preventing excessive limb extension and reducing the risk of structural weakness associated with long, end-weighted regrowth. T2 - Large Yew tree - Lift all lower growth to a minimum of 10ft. Justification - Crown lifting will improve clearance within the garden and around adjacent planting, while retaining the tree???s natural form and canopy structure. The works are limited and sympathetic, removing only the lowest growth to improve accessibility, usability of the garden space, and light penetration, without adversely affecting the long-term health or amenity value of the tree. T3 - Lime tree - Fell to ground level. Justification - The lime tree is of poor form and overall low visual quality, with extensive epicormic growth, basal suckering and unstructured regrowth throughout the canopy. This indicates ongoing stress and a lack of long term structural integrity. The tree is poorly positioned within the garden, limiting its suitability for retention and conflicting with the intended layout and use of the space. It does not contribute positively to the setting and is not in keeping with the overall garden design. There is ample alternative tree cover within the surrounding area, and the removal of this specimen would not result in any significant loss of amenity or canopy value. For these reasons, removal of the tree is considered justified and appropriate. T4 - Lime tree - Reduce crown by approx. 30% taking all new re growth back to previous reduction points and strip all epicormic growth and major dead wood. Justification - Given th
T1 Holly (x1) Fell to ground level. Reason: The tree is growing in an unsuitable location and is being supressed by a much larger, adjacent tree.
Removal of existing shed and conservatory and erection of a single storey rear extension. Erection of a single storey outbuilding to the rear garden. (RECONSULTATION - AMENDED DESCRIPTION)
T6 Holly (x1) Reduce crown by 1-1.5m all round. Reason: To contain the height and spread T7 Horse Chestnut (x1) Reduce crown by 3m all around (to within 1m of previous points of reduction). Crown lift to 5m. Reason: To contain the height and spread T8 Horse Chestnut (x1) Reduce crown by 2 to 3m all around (back to previous points of reduction).Reason: To contain the height and spread
Fell of Broadleaf Privet tree in front garden. The roots are breaking into the drainage and are also causing the manhole on their land to collapse and also the roots are encroaching on the neighbouring property causing paving to crack and lift.
Front garden:- Prunus tree ??? to reduce the crown by 30% (1-2 metres) approximately back to where done before. Rear garden:- Row of Conifers along the rear boundary ??? to reduce the height by approximately 2 metres, cutting back to where previously done and trimming the sides whilst retaining good foliage and screening. Prunus tree along the left boundary (which is leaning) ??? to reduce the crown by 35% (2 metres) in an effort to lessen the weight in the canopy and thin by 15% Holly tree along the right boundary ??? to trim by 0.5 metres whist retaining foliage.
TG1- 2x Himalayan birch, 8m high and 6m wide. These trees are becoming to large for the area they have been planted in, the roots are starting to grow against the drive and we are worried about future damage, we would like to remove the trees in order that something more suitable could be planted.
Tulip - Reduce crown by 2-3m to contain development and limit shade and debris Prunus - Reduce crown by 2-3m to contain development and limit shade and debris Laburnum - Reduce crown by 2-3m to contain development and limit shade and debris
T1-Oak Previously crown reduced with extensive sections of regrowth. Encroaching on neighbouring property on the Northern canopy side. Large overweight lateral limb on the Eastern canopy side. Suggested works are to reduce all aspects back to the previous pruning points, approximately 2-3m from branch tips. Selectively reduce Eastern canopy side to lessen end weight, back to a suitable growth point of no less than one third of parent branch. Raise canopy height to statutory height and ensure sufficient clearance over road, footpath and from neighbouring property.
T1 Apple - Reduce by 50 cm - Dimensions after pruning H 2m W2M. T2 Apple - Reduce by 150 cm - Dimensions after pruning H 3.5m W3m. T3 Pear - Reduce by 150 cm - Dimensions after pruning H 3m W2.5m. T4 Apple - Reduce by 50 cm - Dimensions after pruning H 3m W3m. T5 Plum - Remove the broken branch. T6 Apple - Reduce by 50 cm - Dimensions after pruning H 2m W2M.
As Per Report-See report attached. T1 - Yew Remove epicormic growths T3 - Mixed Group (Group of 2x Maple) Raise low canopy to 4 metres
As Per report T3 is a group consisting of 2 maples located in the boundary of Tudor lodge health centre (please see map) The trees are encroaching on the carpark area which in turn is causing parking issues. The works are apart of a regular maintenance programme These works are necessary as the cars cant fully use the spaces and is causing a health and safety risk.
Check recent applications before setting up alerts. This prevents older applications being sent as new alerts.
Preparation uses a shared source check. Busy sources or larger areas may need the next scheduled collection. No alerts are enabled or emails sent by this step.
